Saturday, January 29, 2011

Warioba Wanyangi v. Romara Romara [1977] LRT 7.,HAMISI GOROGORO v. ASHA MERAGANE (1977) LRT No. 41,MWAMBOPE MWAITENDA v LAZARO MWAKANJUKI (19

HAMISI GOROGORO v. ASHA MERAGANE (1977) LRT No. 41

Mfalila, J. held that where a transfer of one’s rights over his dota is valid under customary law, such transfer includes the right of the transferee to receive the bride price on the marriage of the dota.

Obiter: Even if Amina (the dota) had been illegitimate the respondent would have had a claim against the appellant. This is because I think the proper people to have made this claim would have been her male relatives; that is to say; the uncles of her child or her own father (Amina’s grandfather). I do not think the respondent could personally stand up and claim Amina’s bride price. p. 183 of LRT.
Justice Mfalila is saying that (under customary law) he does not think that Asha (the mother of the dota) is the right person to claim for and get paid the bride price payment for her own daughter. PATRIARCHY AT ITS BEST!

MWAMBOPE MWAITENDA v LAZARO MWAKANJUKI (1976) LRT 60, Nyalali, Ag. J. – 4/6/1975.
1. The word ‘Ndugu’ in clauses 62 and 64 of the Customary Law [Declaration] Order 1963 must be construed in such wider sense as to keep it within the extended family structure of African Communities to which the declaration relates.
2. The question whether a particular relative qualified to be ‘ndugu’ of the deceased for the purpose of wife-inheritance is a matter of customary law of the community concerned.
3. Where the customary law [Declaration] Order is silent on a question the answer must be found in the undeclared customary law olf the Wanyakyusa.
4. On the evidence given at the trial before the Primary Court, it would appear that the stepson of a widow for purposes of inheriting that widow as a wife, is a ‘ndugu’ of his late father.
5. The customary law [declaration] order being subject to any relevant Act of Parliament is subject to the LMA 1971.
6. S.25(d) of the LMA recognizes marriages contracted according to customary rights but section 14 (3) prohibits any person from marrying the former spouse of his or her parent.
7. As no evidence was adduced at the trial to show the exact date of the alleged marriage, the appellant failed to discharge the burden of proving that the marriage took place before the lst May 1971 when the LMA came into force. APPEAL DISMISSED.

This case translated Clause 62 of GN 279/63 (28/6/1963) at p.237 of the casebook as follows:
“The widow is asked whether she wishes to be taken over by a kinsman of the deceased. If she does not so wish, bride price does not become refundable and she is free to go and live with her own kinsmen”
Clause 64 – p. 238 of the casebook:
If the widow agrees to live as a wife of one of the kinsmen of the deceased, and the family council approves, she becomes the lawful wife of that kinsman of the deceased.

Mbaruka v. Chimonyogo (PC) [1971] HCD 406
Mwakasendo, Ag. J.
Where a mge has lasted for a very long time (in this case over 22 years and 2 issues) the chances are that the return of bride price swill be ordered in inverse proportion to the number of hears that the marriage has lasted. The longer the mge subsists the dimmer will be the prospects for the claimant, whether he is the innocent party or not, succeeding in getting a refund of the bride price that he had paid at the inception of the mge. The reasons why this should be so are obvious. The original parties to the transaction may have died or, even if they have not died, their fortunes may have adversely changed in the intervening period, so much so that is may be unconscionable to order any refund of bride price. If these propositions are not acceptable, as they are bound to by the tremulous and conservative part of our people, I cannot see what would stop a grand old man of 80 claiming the return of bride price paid 50 years before when he married his divorced 66 year old wife. I have deliberately chosen this extreme case to demonstrate the absurdity to which an untrammeled application of customary rules can lead.
3. Speaking for myself, I believe that customary rules are like the reinless wild horse which only the expert horseman can mount and control but left to the uninitiated it can do deadly harm. I believe too that it is the duty of the courts at this momentous period of our history to assist the growth and promotion of equitable customary rules. We would be failing totally in this respect if we were to abide, without reflection or commonsense, by the unchanging and changeless traditions of the past as if they were priceless medieval relics.
4. I have very little doubt in my own mind that there could be no justification whatsoever for ordering the respondent to refund to the appellant the remainder of the bride price. The appellant should in fact count himself lucky that he got the refund of as many as 12 head of cattle, to which, with respect, I do not think he was entitled…


Warioba Wanyangi v. Romara Romara [1977] LRT 7. - MAGANGA, Ag. J. 21/6/1975.
[The Late Judge Maganga thought that a Kuria Custimary rule which holds a father liable for the torts of his adult son repugnant to reason and natural justice.]
A father is not vicariously liable for the tortuous acts of his child who is not a minor. Appeal dismissed.
ALI ZANDA v. Mohamed Ngago (1973) LRT 16 – Mfalila, Ag. J. , p 67 casebook.
Circumstances in which PCs may exercise civil jurisdiction under section 14 (1) (a) (i) of the MCA, i.e. where customary law is applicable. [The MCA 1984 has only s 14 (1)]

1. Such matters must between members of a community in which rules of customary law on the subject matter are established and accepted and if the parties come from different communities the 2 communities must have similar provisions on the matter.
(ii) If the matter relates to status or succession, the person involved must have belonged to a community in which rules of customary law relevant to the matter are established and accepted;
(iii) By the nature of the dispute it is appropriate that the matter be decided in accordance with customary law except where there are strong indications to the contrary.

Sunday, January 23, 2011

MSIBA WA KUONDOKEWA NA CHIFU PATRICE KUNAMBI

SUNDAY NEWS Reporter, 22nd January 2011

ONE of the founders of Tanganyika African Union (TANU) and CCM, Chief Patrick Kunambi, died early on Saturday 22/1/2011 in Dar es Salaam.

CCM Secretary General, Yussuf Makamba said in a statement that Chief Kunambi died at 3:25 am at his home in Ubungo Msewe of heart complications.

He was 94. “CCM received reports of Chief Kunambi’s death with shock and extreme grief. “Chief Kunambi was one of 17 founder members of TANU on July 7, 1954.

He was one of the four founder members of TANU who were still alive until yesterday,” Mr Makamba said in the statement bearing a condolence message to the bereaved family, relatives, friends and all CCM members.

Mr Makamba paid tribute to Chief Kunambi for his enormous and outstanding contribution to the nation throughout his life time, as a nationalist, civil servant and a public leader. Patrict Kunambi was born on August 16, 1916 in Matombo Ward, Morogoro Region.

He was the last of 11 children of Chief Kunambi, who died in 1955 at the age of 145. He attained his secondary school education in Tabora, where he was one of the students of the Father of the Nation, Mwalimu Julius Kambarage Nyerere.

Chief Kunambi later attended Tabora Teachers’ College and Makerere University College, Uganda. He taught at different schools and teachers’ training colleges, before going to the University of Duqene in the United States for a Masters Degree between 1962 and 1964.

He served as the Registrar at the University of Dar es Salaam as a volunteer for nine months. Chief Kunambi was Director of Personnel and Administration at the National Transport Corporation (NTC) between 1971 and 1979. Chief Kunambi was an active TANU leader despite his other engagements as the Chief of Waluguru in Morogoro Region and a teacher.

According to the CCM statement, he led a historic TANU meeting in early 1955, which resolved to send Mwalimu Nyerere to the United Nations in New York to press for the independence of Tanganyika.

Mwalimu was in New York to counter a delegation sent by British Colonial administration which campaigned for delay of the independence of Tanganyika for 25 years.

The late Chief Kunambi is survived by two children and seven grandchildren. His wife, Bernadeta, and his two children had passed away.

R I P.

Thursday, January 13, 2011

WIZI IDARA YA MAGEREZA WAGUNDULIWA NA WAZIRI?

9/1/2011 Waziri Mambo ya Ndani adanganywa Magereza (Habari Leo) tanzania

MRADI wa OMIS uliozinduliwa Desemba 17, mwaka jana na Waziri wa Mambo ya Ndani, Shamsi Vuai Nahodha katika Ofisi ya Makao Makuu ya Jeshi la Magereza umetajwa kuwa ulilenga kufunika utaratibu mbaya uliotumika katika utekelezaji wa mradi huo na kuisababishia hasara Serikali. Mradi wa OMIS (Offenders Management Information System), ulibuniwa na Jeshi la Magereza ukiwa na lengo la kuunganisha idara zote zinazohusika na masuala ya uhalifu ambazo ni Magereza, Polisi, Mahakama, Parole na Huduma za Jamii. Lengo la mradi huo ni kuboresha shughuli za wafungwa kwa kuzifanya idara husika ziweze kutekeleza shughuli zao kwa haraka na ufanisi kwa kutumia teknolojia ya kompyuta. Taarifa ya kurasa tisa iliyowasilishwa kwa Waziri Nahodha ambayo gazeti hili limefanikiwa kuipata nakala yake inayoelezea uhalisia wa mradi huo imefafanua upungufu mkubwa wa kiutendaji, jambo ambalo waziri huyo hakuelezwa awali.
Ndani ya taarifa hiyo, ilielezwa kuwa ni aibu kwa Waziri kukaribishwa kuzindua mradi huo huku uongozi wa Magereza ukifahamu wazi kuwa utekelezaji wake ulikwenda kinyume na nyaraka ya zabuni ya mradi wa OMIS-Software kumbukumbu namba 12/2006/2007 iliyoandaliwa Julai 23, 2007. Waraka huo ambao imeelezwa kuwa maelekezo yake hayakufuatwa, uliandaliwa na Wizara ya Mambo ya Ndani ya Nchi, ndio ulipaswa kutumika kumpata mzabuni aliyepaswa kusimika mfumo huo katika eneo la majaribio, upande wa Jeshi la Magereza, lakini hilo halikufanyika, kwa mujibu wa waraka huo. Kwa mfano, taarifa hiyo ilieleza, mradi huo ulikwenda kinyume na waraka wa zabuni hiyo Omis-Software, uliosimikwa hauna uwezo wa kupanuliwa punde utakapohitajika kutumika sehemu nyingine za utekelezaji wa mradi huo ili kupeana taarifa katika maeneo yote yenye mfumo huo katika uendeshaji wa shughuli za wafungwa.Pia ilielezwa kuwa utekelezaji wa mradi huo umekwenda kinyume na kifungu namba 5 cha zabuni hiyo ambacho kilikuwa kikifafanua utekelezaji kwenye mahitaji ya mradi husika (OMIS-Software user requirements), jambo ambalo limezua sintofahamu kuhusu utekelezaji na ukamilikaji wa mradi huo. Kutokana na sababu hiyo, ilielezwa kuwa uzinduzi wa mradi huo umemdhalilisha Waziri kwa kuwa walitumia ugeni wake katika wizara hiyo kubariki mradi uliokwenda kinyume na maelekezo ya wizara husika. “Uzinduzi wa OMIS uliofanyika Desemba 17 mwaka jana, ulifanyika wakati mradi wa OMIS-Software ukiwa na kasoro nyingi zinazoashiria ubadhirifu wa fedha za Serikali, kupitia udanganyifu unaotengeneza mazingira yatakayodumisha ubadhirifu wa fedha za Serikali,” taarifa hiyo ilieleza. Pia taarifa hiyo ilieleza kuwa vielelezo vya malipo katika mradi huo vinaonesha wazi kwamba Kampuni ya GIVA ambayo inadaiwa kupata zabuni ya mradi huo kinyume na utaratibu, imetumika kama daraja la kuchotea fedha kupitia mradi huo ambapo hadi Oktoba 5, mwaka jana, ilikuwa imelipwa jumla ya Sh 1,936,541,550. Kwa mujibu wa taarifa hiyo, malipo ya hivi karibuni yalifanyika kwa awamu sita ambapo Aprili 4, kupitia vocha namba 995592 ililipwa Sh 410, 884, 850; Juni 25, kwa vocha namba 996861, ililipwa Sh 89,115,150; Juni 24, kwa vocha namba 696977 ililipwa Sh 46,994,154.50. Malipo mengine yalifanyika Juni 27 vocha namba 694001, Sh 453,005,845.50; Septemba 9 kupitia akaunti namba 021240777055 ililipwa Sh 153,287,550; na Oktoba 5 kupitia akaunti namba hiyo hiyo ililipwa Sh 183,254,000. Pia ilielezwa kuwa katika mazingira ya utatanishi, kampuni hiyo iliiuzia Magereza ‘seva’ sita zenye kasi ya 2.2Ghz kwa Sh milioni 410 kwa kutumia zabuni ambayo ‘ilipikwa’ kwani ilikiuka taratibu. Gazeti hili lilielezwa kuwa wakati Jeshi la Magereza likinunua vifaa hivyo, tayari lilikuwa na vingine vitano vyenye uwezo mkubwa zaidi, kwani vina kasi ya 3.4 Ghz, hivyo vifaa vilivyonunuliwa kutoka GIVA vimepitwa na wakati kwa kuwa havitakidhi mahitaji ya mradi huo. Uongozi wa kampuni hiyo ulikiri kuwa Kampuni ya GIVA ilihusika katika mradi huo, lakini ulikataa kutoa taarifa zaidi kuhusu madai yaliyoandikwa kwenye ripoti hiyo. Ilielezwa kuwa Waziri Nahodha alidanganywa waziwazi, kwani katika hotuba ya uzinduzi wa mradi huo katika eneo la majaribio, aliambiwa kuwa mradi huo umekamilika kwa dola milioni moja za Marekani wakati si kweli. Ilielezwa pia kuwa hiyo ilitokana na ukweli kwamba wakati kauli hiyo ikitolewa hakupewa mchanganuo wa matumizi ya fedha katika mradi huo ambao inaonesha wazi matumizi zaidi ya fedha. Pia ilielezwa kuwa software (data au programu ya kompyuta) za alama za vidole na vifaa vingine vinavyotumika katika mradi huo, mpaka sasa havijulikani kinyume na maagizo ya zabuni hiyo, hivyo kujitokeza walakini katika matumizi ya fedha za ziada zilizolipwa kwa kampuni hiyo. Gazeti hili liliwasiliana na Ofisi ya Waziri Nahodha ili kupata ufafanuzi wa jambo hilo, ambapo Katibu wake aliyejitambulisha kwa jina la Nelson alisema kuwa Waziri bado mgeni katika wizara hiyo anahitaji muda wa maandalizi kabla ya kutoa kauli kuhusu jambo hilo. “Nitawasiliana naye kuhusu jambo hilo, nadhani na wewe unajua kwamba Waziri ndio kwanza ameanza kazi hivyo si rahisi akajua kila kitu kinachoendelea katika kila idara, nitumie namba yako ya simu tukishauriana nitakupigia,” alisema Nelson. Lakini hata baada ya kupita wiki mbili sasa, hakuna majibu yaliyotolewa, ilhali watendaji wakuu ndani ya Jeshi hilo wakionekana kukwepa kulizungumzia hilo kwa kile wanachodai kubanwa na majukumu ya kikazi.

MWAKYEMBE ASEMA DOWANS KAMPUNI HEWA HAISTAHILI KULIPWA CHOCHOTE

Naibu Waziri wa Ujenzi, Dk. Harrison Mwakyembe
Naibu Waziri wa Ujenzi, Dk. Harrison Mwakyembe, amevunja ukimya kuhusu sakata la kutaka kulipwa fidia ya mabilioni ya Shilingi kampuni ya kufua umeme wa dharura ya Dowans Tanzania Limited, kwa kueleza kwamba itakuwa jambo la ajabu kama serikali itakubali kulipa fedha hizo, kwani kampuni hiyo awali ilibainika kuwa ya kitapeli, lakini sasa inaonekana kuwa ni halali.
“Tulishasema kuwa Richmond ni kampuni hewa ambapo Dowans wamerithi mkataba hewa, hivyo inakuwaje walipwe tena mabilioni ya fedha, tunasubiri kuona msingi uliotumika tapeli kulipwa fidia kwa kazi ya utapeli, nitaangalia amelipwa kwa sheria ipi,” alisema Dk. Mwakyembe jijini Dar es Salaam jana.
Dk. Mwakyembe ambaye alikuwa Mwenyekiti wa Kamati Teule ya Bunge iliyoundwa kuchunguza mchakato wa zabuni ya kuzalisha umeme wa dharura kwa Kampuni ya Richmond Development LLC, alitoa tamko hilo katika mahojiano maalum na NIPASHE ofisini kwake, baada ya kuwa kimya kwa muda mrefu tangu itolewe hukumu hiyo ya Mahakama ya Kimataifa ya Usuluhishi (ICC) na kulitaka Shirika la Umeme Tanzania (Tanesco) kuamuriwa kuilipa Dowans Sh. bilioni 94..Alisema suala la kutaka kuilipa Dowans lina sura mbili, sura ya kisiasa na sura ya kitaalamu.
Alisema katika sura ya kitaalamu yeye kama mwanasheria ambaye amekuwa katika fani hiyo kwa zaidi ya miaka 20, anasubiri kwanza hukumu hiyo isajiliwe na itatoa fursa kila Mtanzania kuyasoma na kuyaelewa yaliyomo ndani.
Dk. Mwakyembe alisema kama mwanasheria, anatilia mashaka na kuzua maswali mengi hukumu hiyo kwa sababu haiwezekani kampuni iliyoonekana mwanzo kuwa ni ya kitapeli leo inaonekana halali.
“Mimi ni mwalimu wa sheria wa siku nyingi na nimekuwa kwenye fani hii kwa zaidi ya miaka 20, kwa hiyo nasubiri kwa hamu usajili wa hukumu hiyo ya ICC ili nione ni sheria ipi iliyotumiwa na wanasheria, tapeli kulipwa fidia kwa kazi yake ya utapeli,” alisema Waziri Mwakyembe.
Dk. Mwakyembe alisema baada ya kusajiliwa kwa hukumu hiyo, pia ana dukuduku la kutaka kujua ni vipi Tanzania imepoteza kesi rahisi kama hiyo ambayo hata mwanafunzi wa mwaka wa kwanza wa Shahada ya Sheria angeweza kuiendesha na kushinda.
“Nina dukuduku kutaka kujua ni vipi tumepoteza kesi rahisi kama hii ambayo hata mwanafunzi wangu wa mwaka wa kwanza wa digrii ya sheria nina uhakika angeshinda kwa sababu Bunge lilishatafuna kila kitu,” alisema.
Alisema kama serikali itaingia mkenge kulipa mabilioni hayo ya fedha, ipo katika hatari ya kuingizwa katika kesi iliyofunguliwa Marekani ambayo Dowans wameshitakiana na Richmond kutokana na kung’ang’ania mtambo mmojawapo wa kuzalisha umeme.
Alisema kesi hiyo kati ya Dowans na Richmond ipo katika Mahakama ya Wilaya ya Kusini (The United State District Court for the Southern District of Texas Houstorn Division) ambapo zipo tetesi kuwa Tanzania itakapolipa fedha hizo itajumuishwa kwenye kesi hiyo ya kugombaniana mitambo.
“Dowans na Richmond wameshitakiana Marekani kwa kung’ang’ania mtambo GE TM2005 S/N 481-364,7LM 2005-PE-MDW GE UNIT ID.W/O 601178, sasa zipo tetesi kwamba Tanzania inasubiliwa kuingizwa katika kesi hiyo itakapokubali kulipa fedha hizo,” alisema.
Alisema hatua ya Waziri wa Nishati na Madini, William Ngeleja, kueleza kwamba serikali imeamua kuilipa fedha Dowans, ameufanya haraka kwa sababu angesubiri kwanza hukumu hiyo isajiliwe.
Aliongeza kuwa kama serikali itakubali kulipa fidia hizo, kutakuwa kuna utata kwa sababu majina ya waliotajwa kuwa ni wamiliki wa Dowans Tanzania Limited, lakini wale wa Dowans Holding SA (Costa Rica) hawajulikani na wala hawana anuani ya posta wala simu nchini.
Alisema anayetajwa pekee kuwa mmiliki wa Dowans Holding SA ni Bernal Zamora Arase ambaye hata hivyo, ana makampuni 100 yanayoishia na SA.
“Huyu Bernal Zamora Arase anayetajwa kuwa mmiliki wa Dowans Holding SA hana simu, ofisi wala anuani ya posta, nyumba ya kuishi, gari wala pikipiki hapa nchini,” alisema Dk. Mwakyembe.
Aliongeza kuwa Watanzania wengi bado wanafahamu kuwa chini ya makubaliano, mali zote za Richmond bado hazijahamishiwa Dowans na hivyo wanalipwa pesa kinyemela na wameshitakiana Marekani.
Naibu Waziri huyo akizungumzia katika sura ya kisiasa kuhusiana na sakata la Dowans, alisema wasemaji wakuu ni Spika wa Bunge, ambaye Bunge lake lilipitisha maazimio 23 mwaka 2008 ambapo kati ya maazimio hayo ambayo yalihukumu Richmond kuwa ni kampuni hewa.
Alisema Bunge hilo pia lilienda mbele zaidi kwa kuagiza kutaka ifutwe kwenye orodha ya makampuni halali Tanzania ambapo Oktoba 2008 Richmond ilifutwa kama kampuni isiyo halali.
“Kimsingi, mwenye mamlaka ya kuelezea hatma ya maazimio 23 yaliyotolewa na Bunge ni Spika wa Bunge la Tanzania, kwa sababu hukumu ya ICC imegusa baadhi ya maadhimisho,” alisema.
Dk. Mwakyembe alisema pia Waziri Mkuu ambaye kikatiba ni msimamizi mkuu wa shughuli za Bunge na serikali hivyo ana imani baada ya kupokea ushauri wa Mwanasheria Mkuu wa Serikali atakuwa na kauli yake ya mwisho.
CHANZO: NIPASHE

LEGAL AND HUMAN RIGHTS CENTRE NGO (tanzania) BLOCK PAYMENT TO DOWANS

Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Chris Mwasambili wrote:

BY LAZARO FELIX

12th January 2011



Legal and Human Rights Centre board member Dr Edmund Sengondo Mvungi talks to journalists in Dar es Salaam yesterday. Others are LHRC Director Francis Kiwanga and TAMWA Executive Director Ananilea Nkya.

Tanesco and Dowans` issue took a new twist yesterday after the Legal and Human Rights Centre (LHRC) filed a case at the High Court to block the government’s decision to pay the power firm 97bn/-.

According to the LHRC Executive Director Francis Kiwanga, the High Court (Commercial Division) was expected to set up the date and appoint a judge for the hearing of the case tomorrow.

“In our application, we asked the High Court to speed up hearing of the case. We hope it will do so…we are now waiting for instructions on Thursday,” he noted.

“We are challenging the hefty compensation…it is a huge amount of money, which is unfair to pay to Dowans,” Kiwanga told a press conference in Dar es Salaam yesterday.

The LHRC has contracted a prominent constitutional lawyer and university lecturer, Dr Sengondo Mvungi to represent them in court.

The latest move by lawyers and activists from the LHRC comes a few days after the government through the Ministry of Energy and Minerals agreed to pay Dowans the money as compensation for breach of the contract by Tanesco.

The government’s stance to compensate Dowans has attracted a fierce condemnation from legislators and civil society organisations. A few days ago, the Minister for Energy and Minerals William Ngeleja said: “The ministry has agreed to pay Dowans as per the ruling of the International Chamber of Commercial (ICC).”

The ICC ordered the state-run power firm, Tanesco, to pay Dowans 97bn/- for breach of contract — a ruling which is now being disputed by the LHRC as unfair and unjustifiable.

Kiwanga criticised elements of secrecy in the Tanesco-Dowans case, saying members of the public were not informed about the filing and hearing of the case at the ICC.

“The members of the public heard about the case after the ruling by the ICC. Why they made it secret?” queried Kiwanga.

He explained that there were civil societies currently working for the welfare of Tanzanians and promised the centre to maintain the spirit by challenging the ICC ruling the High Court. “LHRC and other organisations played an active in role in saving millions of Tanzanian taxpayers’ money in the case between the City Water and government case some years ago.”

He faulted the government’s decision to pay Dowans before considering other legal options to save taxpayers’ money.

Kiwanga pointed out that Tanesco should not pay even a single cent to Dowans, blaming the government for ignoring the Parliamentary report on the capacity and competence of Richmond/Dowans.

“Ignoring the Parliamentary report on the Richmond Company is itself against the rule of law, pillars of democracy and public interest,” said Kiwanga.

Meanwhile, Dr Sengondo Mvungi asked the government to respect the Parliamentary decision on the Richmond/Dowans issue.

“The Parliament through its committee, which probed the issue, said the Richmond contract was null and void and thus unenforceable. This should be respected by the government,” said Dr Mvungi

He explained that the Tanzania High Court (Commercial Division) would have to say if it supported the ICC to exploit Tanzanians or defended them since the government’s decision in the case was to pay the billions of money, while citizens were starving from poor services.

Tanzania Media Women’s Association (Tamwa) executive director Ananilea Nkya said:

“We should work collectively to make sure Tanesco does not pay the compensation to Dowans,” said Nkya.

She said it was a pity to see that the government was not ready even to appeal against the ICC ruling, a situation she explained as the government’s failure to be accountable to the people, who elected its leaders.

SOURCE: THE GUARDIAN