Tuesday, June 30, 2015

KHALFAN KIKWETE MAKES TANZANIA PROUD !!!

CONGRATULATIONS,  you  DESERVED IT  !!!  WE  ARE PROUD  OF YOU!!! way to go!
BY SYLIVESTER DOMASA, SOURCE: THE GUARDIAN, TZ.
29th June 2015
http://www.ippmedia.com/media/picture/large/6.png
A son of President Jakaya Kikwete, Khalfan Kikwete

 A son of President Jakaya Kikwete, Khalfan, has won a Gold medal in the 2015 Genius Olympiad, an international high school project competition about science, art, business and environmental issues held in US recently.

Kikwete who partnered with his co-student at Feza International School, Seif Yahya Mhata to develop a virtual business cards and new generation business social media mobile application dubbed “VCARDIN” outpaced other ten projects in ‘Business Category.’   

VCARDIN’s purpose is to create a business connection that is sustainable, from the exchange of a virtual business card, Kikwete told reporters in Dar es Salaam over the weekend. 

“We hope to build this connection through our next generation social media platform. It also aims at providing a socially generated global network of people who have smart phones and want to use business cards in order to cultivate the most sustainable and effective business relations.”

VCARDIN (Virtual Card Index) has two main products for solving the above problems, first is "an application for smart phones" and second is "a social media website" (www.vcardin.com).

According to Mhata with the new application, businesspeople will no longer need to use a hardcopy business card. “They will use our free application on their smart phone to send and receive business cards.”

He said the service is also environmental friendly, considering that it will reduce the rate of cutting trees to produce paper for business cards. In US alone he said at least 14,000 tonnes of paper are produced for business cards.

Metin Er, Feza Schools public relations manager and business studies teacher said his school invested US$30,000 in eight different projects, but four of them qualified to the final.

He acknowledged the awards had marketed the country internationally and that they foresee to register about 15 projects next year.

Founded and organised by the Terra Science and Education, this year’s competition was hosted by the State University of New York at Oswego. The 2015 Genius Olympiad had 401 out of 1,171 projects from 69 applicant countries.

Feza Schools participated in 4 projects and managed to win 1 gold medal and 3 bronze medals out of 1,171 projects from 69 countries.

Other projects which won the medals include "The Faults Of Humanity" an art (PHOTOGRAPHY) which was crafted and presented by Prince Mwemezi Muzamil Katunzi a student from Feza Boys High School. Katunzi took a photograph at Kawe (Tanganyika Packers Area) depicting an unlikely event of a forest fire.

The other project which won a Bronze Medal was an environmental friendly project that took part in the business category. The project was entitled ''Waste Paper Charcoal Producing Enterprises''. It was presented by Goodluck Komba and Sajjad El-Amin from Feza Boys' High School.

The project mainly aimed at reducing the dependency of trees on production of charcoal fuel, thus turning waste papers into useful raw materials for the production of charcoal fuel.

The other project titled “Our Environment” that won a Bronze Medal was prepared and presented by Veronica Samuel Ndomba with the purpose of raising human beings awareness on how they can become one of the major source of environment degradation and the proper solutions that will help to save the human race and the future generation.

Monday, June 29, 2015

POLITICAL PARTIES TO BE RUN BY PEOPLE OUTSIDE THE GOVERNMENT WAS THE PEOPLES OPINION WHICH CCM CONSTITUTIONAL PARLIAMENT ERASED !!!

CCM Secretary-General Abdulrahman Kinana addresses a public rally in Mwanza yesterday.  Mr Kinana was in Mwanza Region in the final leg of his countrywide tour. 
PHOTO | MICHAEL JAMSON 
By Bernard Lugongo,The Citizen Reporter

Posted  Monday, June 29  2015 at  08:29
IN SUMMARY
·         CCM Secretary-General Abdulrahman Kinana tells rally in Mwanza during a tour of the region that the party should be led by people who are not in government to give it more supervisory and oversight powers

Dar es Salaam. The Chama Cha Mapinduzi  [CCM] is planning to revamp its structure in a bid to enhance its effectiveness in overseeing the government by putting in place a system in which party leaders will not be part of the government.

CCM secretary general Abdulrahman Kinana stated yesterday at a public rally in Mwanza that one of the things he has learnt over time was that the party doesn’t have enough powers to supervise the government much as it is the one which formed it, having won the elections.
He told hundreds of Mwanza residents who attended the rally meant to conclude his 26-month countrywide that he started soon after he was appointed secretary general. The tour was meant to strengthen the party and assess how the CCM election manifesto for the 2010 elections was implemented.
“We want to exclude the President and his ministers from party leadership; the party should be in the hands of other members, not the Executive,” Mr Kinana said.
“Our aim is to provide the party’s National Executive Committee (NEC) ample powers to oversee the government because the government belongs to the party.”
Mr Kinana said that during his trips, he learnt that even party leaders at the grassroots level were complaining over some problems that have been introduced by the government but they lacked the mandate to reprimand the culpable public officials.
“This situation disappoints citizens when they note that even leaders of the party which is in power are also complaining,” he said.
The party supremo said he was also not happy with some of the laws that Parliament—which has an overwhelming CCM majority—has passed while they are adversely affecting the citizens.
He wondered why the government has been reluctant to remove bad laws that seemed to displease the majority of the people.
“The sad thing is that I have never seen the government withdraw laws which were clearly bad to the people, while it kept on enacting more such laws,” he said.
Mr Kinana also told off government leaders who shy from of going to the citizens to hear about challenges facing them.
“There are only a few ministers who bother to go to listen to the people; most of them prefer going abroad or attending seminars, forgetting that their positions are meant to offer service to the people,” he said.
Earlier, CCM ideology and publicity secretary Nape Nnauye gave the assurance that the party would not entertain candidates who use money to buy leadership.
He said CCM was not selling leadership and warned the aspirants against corrupting the members of the party in order win in the intra-party nominations.
“I am ready to lead the youth in campaigning against any person who uses money to bribe people so that he or she gets leadership. Such kind of person won’t have any chance during the coming General Election,” he said.
Mr Nnauye’s remarks come at a time when, CCM is readying for next month’s sittings in Dodoma where it will nominate its presidential candidate.
This year, the party has seen a significant number of presidential hopefuls who have picked nomination forms in a bid to take over from President Jakaya Kikwete.
Until yesterday, the number of those who collected nomination forms reached 42, with only four days remaining for aspirants to collect and return the documents.
Meanwhile, most of those who had earlier picked up forms are still collecting signatures of supporters without whom they candidacy cannot be considered by the party’s topmost government leadership.
Mr Nnauye also used yesterday’s platform to shower praise on Mr Kinana for what he described as a job well done during his tenure as the party’s secretary general.
He said during his leadership, Mr Kinana has managed to move the party from the office to “the people out there”.
He said through his visits, Mr Kinana managed to push for implementation of projects that were part of the CCM 2010 Election Manifesto. For instance, there were some areas where dispensaries were constructed but were had not operating for years and Mr Kinana ensured they become functional, he said.

Sunday, June 28, 2015

ECUADOR RELEASES 201 TORTOISES ON GALAPAGOS ISLAND


Ecuador releases 201 tortoises on Galapagos island

AFP
Experts believe 14 subspecies of tortoises have lived on the Galapagos Islands, of which three -- including Chelonoidis sp -- are extinct
.
View photo
Experts believe 14 subspecies of tortoises have lived on the Galapagos Islands, of which three -- including Chelonoidis sp -- are extinct (AFP Photo/Rodrigo Buendia)
 
Quito (AFP) - Ecuador has released 201 tortoises on Santa Fe Island in the Galapagos archipelago, where a similar subspecies went extinct more than 150 years ago.

Santa Fe is the former home to Chelonoidis sp, a subspecies of giant tortoise which died out after humans took a hefty toll on the ecosystem, beginning in the 18th century when pirates and buccaneers decimated the population.

"We released in Santa Fe 201 tortoises from the Chelonoidis hoodensis subspecies, which are from Espanola Island, and which have morphological and genetic similarities to the extinct subspecies on the (Santa Fe) island," rangers from Galapagos National Park said.

The 201 tortoises, which were released Saturday, were raised in captivity and are between four and 10 years old.

Of these, 30 have a radio transmitter that will allow park rangers to follow the animals in the wild.
The park service described repopulating the island with tortoises as "a conservation milestone" and said it signified a "new methodology for ecological restoration of the archipelago," which is located 1,000 kilometers (620 miles) off the Ecuadoran coast.

The project will also study the changes that occur in the ecosystem with the tortoises and animal's coexistence with the approximately 6,500 land iguanas that live on the island, according to Danny Rueda, director of Galapagos National Park.

Experts believe 14 subspecies of tortoises have lived on the Galapagos Islands, of which three -- including Chelonoidis sp -- are extinct.

The last member of the extinct Chelonoidis abigdoni subspecies, a tortoise known as "Lonesome George," died three years ago.

The Galapagos Islands are a UNESCO World Heritage Site and are known for their unique flora and fauna.

The Pacific archipelago was made famous by Charles Darwin's studies of its breathtaking biodiversity, which was crucial in his development of the theory of evolution by natural selection.
Santa Fe Island, which is located in the center of the archipelago, has an area of 24.7 square kilometers (9.5 square miles).

TANZANIA FOOD AND DRUG AUTHORITY CLOSED ROMBO DISTRICT ALCOHOL PLANTS

 god  PROHIBITED alcohol and any other  inebriating drug in  the qur-an - blog  owner.

BY GUARDIAN ON SUNDAY CORRESPONDENT
28th June 2015
http://www.ippmedia.com/media/picture/large/Selasini.jpg
Rombo MP, Joseph Selasini (CHADEMA)

Rombo district is in the spotlight for brewing alcohol that is alleged to weaken sexual abilities in men.

Tanzania Food and Drug Authority (TFDA) on Friday closed down seven alcohol producing plants in Rombo District because the drink weakens sexual ability of men and is said to be behind a number of failed marriages in the widely known district of Kilimanjaro Region.

The conditions under which the alcohol, made from banana, is taken widely by low income earners, do not meet professional category because the industries lack laboratories and operate in poor environments. TFDA officials said.

TFDA official, Barnabas Jacob, said the seven are among15 inspected industries and found not to meet criteria of producing alcohol.

He said the plants include Komba, Obama, Twiga, Pundamilia, Zebra, Iyembe, Kilimanjaro, Keni, Chuichui, Jogoo and Bingwa.
Drinking alcohol to excess can make good sex go bad.  Food and drug authority officials and alcohol experts affirmed in the district mid this week that “this is because alcohol reduces both men's and women's sexual sensitivity.”

"In both sexes, sexual response is reduced by regular and prolonged drinking," the experts say.

"In men, alcohol can cause difficulties getting and maintaining an erection - while women may experience reduced lubrication, find it harder to have an orgasm, or have orgasms that are less intense," the TFDA official said.

Many people mistakenly believe that alcohol is an aphrodisiac. However, over time too much alcohol can actually put a dampener on your sex drive, he noted, adding that drinking too much over an extended period of time can turn a temporary condition like 'Brewer's Droop' into full-blown impotence.

Drinking can also cause damage if you are planning to have children. Women in Rombo district had earlier this month complained to have low infertility rates, attributing the agony to excessive drinking among men, according to the media reports.

The experts went on to explain that, women who drink over the lower risk guidelines can take longer to become pregnant and can suffer from menstrual and fertility problems.

Jacob
said the plants faced serious legal measures if they did not comply with their instructions and that they will only be allowed to re-open if they followed required procedure.

Along with the stern legal measure, Jacob warned other industries in the region to follow laid down regulations, insisting that failure to do so would attract similar measures.

Felista Shine, wife of one of the owners, promised to make the necessary adjustments before they start business again.

Another owner who also faced the axe, Prosper Shao, said his plant was  closed down last year, but he said he believed that it now meets the TFDA conditions.

Prime Minister Mizengo Pinda early this week ordered his office to take appropriate action against Rombo District Commissioner Lemrise Kipuyo who said women in his area were hiring Kenyan men to satisfy them sexually since their husbands have turned to alcohol.

Pinda was responding to Rombo MP, Joseph Selasini (CHADEMA) who wanted the premier to apologise to Rombo men because they were humiliated by government officials.
SOURCE: GUARDIAN ON SUNDAY
 

ON GAY MARRIAGE U.S.A. SUPREME COURT JUDGMENT WORLDWIDE OPINION !!! - ASTAGHFIRULLAH !

US same-sex marriage ruling likely to impact other countries - 

[THANK  ALLAH, THERE  ARE  SANE  PEOPLE OUT THERE YET !]-BLOG owner.

Associated Press
Filipino LGBTs (Lesbians Gays Bisexual and Transgenders) hold hands as they gather for a Gay Pride rally Saturday, June 27, 2015 in Mania, Philippines to push for LGBT rights and to celebrate the U.S. Supreme Court decision recognizing gay marriages in all U.S. states as a victory for their cause. The rally was scheduled to commemorate the 1969 demonstrations in New York City that started the gay rights movement around the world. Jonas Bagas, executive director of the pro-LGBT rights group TLF Share, said the U.S. court ruling “will reverberate in other corners of the world.” (AP Photo/Bullit Marquez)
.
View gallery
.
LONDON (AP) — The landmark U.S. Supreme Court ruling in favor of same-sex marriages has no legal force outside the United States, but gay rights activists in many parts of the world believe the court ruling will help their cause.

In the Philippines, in India, in Australia and elsewhere, gay rights advocates think the U.S. ruling may help change attitudes, just as American activists — and judges, educators and legislators — had earlier been influenced by the easy acceptance of same-sex marriage in some European countries, where the laws were changed smoothly without much fuss.
In today's wired world, political movements cross national boundaries in the blink of an eye, and the trend toward legal acceptance of same-sex marriage is gaining pace, though still rejected outright in some parts of the globe. The U.S. is neither laggard nor leader in this movement, which reflects a fundamental change in public views in many parts of the world, but the ruling of its highest court is expected to have a ripple effect elsewhere.
In the Philippines, activists seeking to win legal recognition for same-sex marriages believe the U.S. ruling will be useful, particularly since the country's legal setup is largely based on the U.S. system, said Sylvia Estrada Claudio, a gender rights advocate and professor at the University of the Philippines.
"This ruling will have positive repercussions for our own movements here," she said.
The Philippines' civil code limits marriage to a union between a man and a woman — but the constitutionality of this proviso is being challenged by a lawyer, Jesus Nicardo Falcis III.
Countries are taking different routes to the same conclusion: the U.S. pathway relied on a Supreme Court ruling to establish that same-sex couples have a constitutional right to marry, while Ireland last month used a popular vote that showed strong public backing, despite the country's deep Catholic roots.
Influence is a two-way street. Five years ago, Argentina became the first country in Latin America to legalize gay marriage. Activists there said they believe their example helped influence the U.S., and that Friday's U.S. ruling will in turn shape attitudes and actions in other Latin American countries.
"The U.S. decision will have a big impact in other countries," said Esteban Paulon, president of the Argentine Federation of Lesbians, Gays, Bisexuals and Transsexuals, adding that his organization contributed documentation to U.S. legal groups arguing the case before the Supreme Court. "Sometimes U.S. influence is negative, but we believe in this case it will be positive and accelerate the process of approving gay marriage in other parts of the world."
Twenty-one countries now allow same-sex marriage, according to the Pew Research Center, and Mexico permits it in some states, with many other countries offering various legal rights that fall short of marriage to same-sex couples. In most of those countries, well-organized advocacy groups are lobbying for full marriage rights.
These movements, and startup campaigns incubating in other countries as well, may get a real but hard-to-measure boost from the U.S. Supreme Court.
In Australia, where parliament may vote on a same-sex marriage law later this year despite opposition from Prime Minister Tony Abbott, legislators who back the measure said the U.S. ruling leaves Australia alone among developed, English-speaking nations in its refusal to legalize marriages between same sex couples.
Opinion polls show backing for the measure has increased in Australia in the month since Ireland endorsed same-sex marriage. Opposition leader Bill Shorten — capitalizing on the momentum building in other countries — introduced the bill in Parliament just days after Ireland voted.
He said Saturday that Australians should see the U.S. ruling as "a call to action." Legislator Janet Rice, Greens Party leader, called the U.S. ruling "the loudest call yet for marriage equality in Australia ."
Still, staunch opposition remains, with Australian Marriage Forum president David van Gend calling the U.S. Supreme Court decision proof of "moral dementia."
"We must not let that happen here," van Gend said.
The issue is different in India, where activists believe the U.S. ruling may make Indian judges and legislators feel uncomfortably isolated by the 2013 Indian Supreme Court decision to reinstate a colonial-era law making homosexuality a crime.
The law calls homosexuality an "unnatural offense" punishable by 10 years in jail. In the past, police have used it to harass people and demand bribes from gays.
Ashok Row Kavi, head of the Humsafar Trust advocacy group, said the U.S. ruling may force India's highest court to take a fresh look at the issue.
"In the light of globalization, the (Indian) Supreme Court judgment is being cited as a totally reactionary judgment," he said. "A judgment that goes against the whole concept of human rights which had been on a progressive upsurge in India."
At gay pride parades in Dublin, Paris and other cities Saturday, the U.S. ruling was hailed by many as a watershed.
"Soon in all countries we will be able to marry," said Celine Schlewitz, a 25-year-old nurse taking part in the Paris parade. "Finally a freedom for everyone."
The U.S. ruling boosted street celebrations Saturday in Dublin, where Ireland mounted the biggest gay rights parade in the country's history.
Led by rainbow banners and drag queens, more than 60,000 people paraded through Dublin at the culmination of a weeklong gay rights festival in the Irish capital. While the mood was already high following Ireland's referendum last month to legalize gay marriage — becoming the first nation to do so by popular vote — many marchers said the Supreme Court decision provided a bonus reason to celebrate.
"Everybody seems to be gay in Dublin today," said Sen. David Norris, Ireland's most prominent gay rights activist. He quipped that Ireland was pleased to see the United States, though the Supreme Court judgment, "start to catch up to us."
In other countries where gay sex is treated as a crime, beleaguered activists said they took heart from the U.S. ruling even though same-sex marriage is not on the horizon. In most cases, activists seek to decriminalize homosexuality before pressing for marriage rights and other benefits.
In the deeply conservative Arab world, where homosexuality is regarded as a crime in many countries, some clerics warned that the U.S. ruling would lead to the collapse of civilizations.
In Jordan, where homosexuality is not illegal but is considered taboo, one member of the small gay community said the U.S. ruling is "a victory for human rights in general and gives everyone hope."
He is hopeful same-sex marriage will one day be legal in Jordan.
"In this region, we are going through the dark ages, and when we come out, we will move toward full rights," he said, speaking on condition of anonymity because he feared the consequences of being identified as gay.
Marriage equality is also not part of the conversation in many parts of Africa, where more than two-thirds of the countries treat homosexuality as a crime.
That is true of Cameroon, which has pursued dozens of prosecutions in recent years under an anti-gay law imposing up to five years in prison for same-sex acts.
Lambert Lamba, a leading Cameroonian activist who has been imprisoned on accusations of violating anti-gay laws, said he was "exulting" in the U.S. ruling.
"It's a giant step for the fight in the United States," he said. "And it confirms for me that we can take giant steps in Cameroon as well."
___
Associated Press writers Oliver Teves in Manila, Philippines; Nirmala George in New Delhi; Rod McGuirk in Canberra, Australia; Debora Rey in Buenos Aires, Argentina; Milos Krivokapic in Paris; Shawn Pogatchnik in Dublin; and Karin Laub in Amman, Jordan, contributed to this report.

JUSTICE KENNEDY'S RENDITION OF THE GAY MARRIAGE JUDGMENT DEFIES THE RELIGIOUS GROUND !!!

Supporters of gay marriage wave the rainbow flag after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Friday that the U.S. Constitution provides same-sex couples the right to marry at the Supreme Court in Washington June 26, 2015. The court ruled 5-4 that the Constitution's guarantees of due process and equal protection under the law mean that states cannot ban same-sex marriages. With the ruling, gay marriage will become legal in all 50 states.
Joshua Roberts / Reuters

Unambiguous   -   [BLASPHEMOUS,   FROM  START TO FINISH - blog owner]

26/6/2015, 12:01 PM ET

A Manifesto for Marriage Equality

Justice Kennedy swings for the fences in a maximalist opinion that confirms gay marriage is here, and there's no going back.
 
Justice Anthony Kennedy today ensured his legacy as the man who, more than any other individual, secured the legal equality of gays and lesbians.

On the 12-year anniversary of his opinion in Lawrence v. Texas, finding state sodomy laws unconstitutional—and the two-year anniversary of his opinion in Windsor v. United States, finding the federal Defense of Marriage Act unconstitutional—Justice Kennedy today wrote the opinion in Obergefell v. Hodges, finding state bans on same-sex marriage unconstitutional, and securing full marriage equality for gays and lesbians across America.

What’s more, he swung for the fences, rejecting Chief Justice Roberts’s judicial minimalism to write a sweeping 5-4 opinion that reads like a manifesto in favor of same-sex marriage—ironically using many conservative arguments for marriage to do so.

The majority opinion in Obergefell is 28 pages long. Ten pages tell the stories of the case’s plaintiffs, and the history of the debate about marriage equality—already an unusual proportion of humanity to legalese. The next eight pages are about why marriage is a fundamental right, regardless of the genders of those getting married. As Justice Scalia, in particular, complained, they are filled with sweeping statements about the importance and meaning of marriage.

In other words, 18 out of the opinion’s 28 pages are a kind of doctoral thesis on the nature and importance of marriage. Only the last 10  engage in the typical, legalistic way with Supreme Court precedence and 14th Amendment jurisprudence.

To be sure, those 10 pages do adequately situate the case in its constitutional context, engaging with other cases extending marriage to previously excluded groups: Loving v. Virginia (mixed-race couples), Turner (inmates), and Zablocki (deadbeat dads). It makes a strong (and unusual, though not for Justice Kennedy) case that the two clauses of the 14th Amendment—guaranteeing equal protection and due process—are interlocked. And it responds to the dissenters’ concern that the Supreme Court is cutting off legislative debate, noting that that debate has gone on for many years already and the court’s role is to protect fundamental rights.

But it is the first 18 pages of the opinion that will be remembered in history—which, surely, is what Justice Kennedy had in mind.

Those pages are filled with “money lines” that can fill the Facebook pages of LGBT people and their allies.  For example, consider Justice Kennedy’s four principles for why the right to marry is fundamental:

First, “The nature of marriage is that, through its enduring bond, two persons together can find other freedoms, such as expression, intimacy, and spirituality.” Thus defined (as opposed, say, to “complementarity” or other religiously-derived notions - [THE RELIGIOUSLY-DERIVED NOTIONS ARE THE ONLY NOTIONS DICTATED BY ALLAH -  Blog owner)], the nature of marriage obviously extends to all people, regardless of gender or sexual orientation.[ASTAGHFIRULLAH].  

Second, “the right to marry is fundamental because it supports a two-person union unlike any other in its importance to the committed individuals.” Here, too, that is true for gay as well as straight couples. “As this Court held in Lawrence,” Kennedy wrote, citing himself, “same-sex couples have the same right as opposite-sex couples to enjoy intimate association.”
“The nature of marriage is that, through its enduring bond, two persons together can find other freedoms, such as expression, intimacy, and spirituality.”
“A third basis for protecting the right to marry,” Kennedy continued, “is that it safeguards children and families and thus draws meaning from related rights of childrearing, procreation, and education.”
While this is usually a conservative talking point, Kennedy observed that “as all parties agree, many same-sex couples provide loving and nurturing homes to their children, whether biological or adopted.”  Thus, “excluding same-sex couples from marriage thus conflicts with a central premise of the right to marry.”

Finally, Justice Kennedy wrote, “marriage is a keystone of our social order.” Enabling same-sex couples to marry strengthens, rather than weakens, marriage in general.

These four principles are a remarkable example of philosophical jujitsu, turning conservative arguments against conservatives. They essentially argue that marriage is important (conservative), and therefore it should be extended to all (liberal). Not coincidentally, this is much how the conservative same-sex marriage advocate Theodore Olson has framed the issue in numerous court cases and essays.

Justice Kennedy’s four principles are also a remarkable example of judicial writing. Justice Scalia called it “a style that is as pretentious as its content is egotistic.” And in a way, the criticism is warranted—Justice Kennedy is writing a broad philosophical treatise, not just a judicial opinion.
This continues when he moves on to the other central issues in the case.

Justice Scalia, for example, shockingly said that only marriages protected in 1868 (when the 14th Amendment was ratified) are protected today, a radical originalism that would allow states to ban mixed-race marriages, or allow women’s rights to be subsumed by their husbands (part of “coverture,” long a fundamental part of traditional marriage).


Supporters of gay marriage rally in front of the Supreme Court in Washington June 25, 2015. A decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, a test of a constitutional right to same-sex marriage, is expected in the coming days. REUTERS/Joshua Roberts - RTR4YXU1
Joshua Roberts/Reuters
Noting these evolutions of marriage, Justice Kennedy concludes, “If rights were defined by who exercised them in the past, then received practices could serve as their own continued justification and new groups could not invoke rights once denied.”

That is as succinct and clear a refutation of originalism as I have ever read.

And when Justice Kennedy turns to the religious objections some have to same-sex marriage, he again uses soaring tones: “Many who deem same-sex marriage to be wrong reach that conclusion based on decent and honorable religious or philosophical premises, and neither they nor their beliefs are disparaged here. But when that sincere, personal opposition becomes enacted law and public policy, the necessary consequence is to put the imprimatur of the State itself on an exclusion that soon demeans or stigmatizes those whose own liberty is then denied. Under the Constitution, same-sex couples seek in marriage the same legal treatment as opposite-sex couples, and it would disparage their choices and diminish their personhood to deny them this right.”

That statement is too long for a bumper sticker, but it, too, is a considered articulation of the difference between religious and civil marriage.

Finally, Justice Kennedy’s ultimate conclusion seems intended to be the final word on marriage equality, and to seal his legacy as well.  And it is a deserved summation of two decades of his own evolution on this fundamental question of civil rights:

"No union is more profound than marriage, for it embodies the highest ideals of love, fidelity, devotion, sacrifice, and family. In forming a marital union, two people become something greater than once they were. As some of the petitioners in these cases demonstrate, marriage embodies a love that may endure even past death. It would misunderstand these men and women to say they disrespect the idea of marriage. Their plea is that they do respect it, respect it so deeply that they seek to find its fulfillment for themselves. Their hope is not to be condemned to live in loneliness, excluded from one of civilization’s oldest institutions. They ask for equal dignity in the eyes of the law. The Constitution grants them that right."ASTAGHFIRULLAH. 

Saturday, June 27, 2015

ALLAH PROHIBITED SUCH LOTTERY GAMES !!!

http://www.thecitizen.co.tz/image/view/-/2767070/highRes/1047113/-/maxw/600/-/xw12yp/-/02-Voda.jpg
GBT Director General Tarimba Abbas 


Posted  Saturday, June 27  2015 at  12:19
IN SUMMARY
He says he participated in the promotion that Vodacom ran for several months and struck the jackpot. He reportedly won Sh100 million, the highest prize but Vodacom say it was mistaken sent by the system..
Dar es Salaam. In what appears to mirror the biblical David and Goliath clash, a Dar es Salaam resident is readying to sue Vodacom Tanzania over an SMS that would have made him a millionaire overnight.
Mr Daniel Njau, 47, is accusing the telecommunication giant of taking him and his family for a ride over the recently concluded “Jay Millionaire” lottery promotion.
He says he participated in the promotion that Vodacom ran for several months and struck the jackpot. He reportedly won Sh100 million, the highest prize.
“It was one of the happiest days of our lives as a family,” he says. “It was in January when, through a Vodacom SMS, the number of my son Innocent was announced the day’s winner of the Sh100 million.”
The younger Njau is a student in Moshi and had left the telephone number to his father as he went to school. “The number was enrolled in the Jay Millionaire promotion and I continued to play, receiving the daily short messages as the days progressed,” the senior Njau explains.
As he went about his daily routine, Mr Njau received the SMS that would have turned the Njau family’s lives around. The younger Njau’s number had won the promotion of the day’s top prize of Sh100 million.
He told The Citizen in an interview: “My heart skipped as I read the message. I could not believe our luck. I slept over the news, not having the guts to tell anyone. I decided to wait for a call from Vodacom, as promised, before breaking the news to other members of the family.”
The call did not come within the 48 hours Vodacom had reportedly said. As the clock ticked without any communication, Mr Njau became apprehensive. “Anxiety grew with each passing day and all I could do was hope the call that would make me a millionaire was a few seconds away.
That SMS remained permanently on display,” he said of the message that read: “Hongera! Wewe ni mshindi wa leo was TZS MILIONI 100. Utapigiwa simu na wafanyakazi wa Vodacom kwa maelezo zaidi ndani ya masaa 48.”
The message announces that the subscriber’s number was the winner of Sh100 million for a particular day’s draw. It says the lottery winner would be contacted by Vodacom employees within 48 hours. But that all-important call did not come and Mr Njau, a Dar es Salaam-based businessman, took it upon himself to visit Vodacom offices and those of the Betting Control Board to find out what was happening.
It has been five months of criss-crossing between the company and the board, according to Mr Njau. Vodacom now says that message was wrongly sent to his son’s registered number and reportedly appears reluctant to pay up. But Mr Njau is staying on the case. “I am shocked and disappointed but I have not given up on the matter,” he says. “We have decided to pursue justice in court and have already instructed our lawyer to file a case against Vodacom and the Betting Board.”
He has written several letters to the Board and details numerous meetings between himself, the board and Vodacom to no avail. The older Njau is acting on behalf of his son through the power of attorney.
“The promotion promised millionaires every day for the months that it ran. My experience now suggests there may have been no such millionaires and all they did was collect millions from those enrolled but created no such promised millionaires,” Mr Njau claims. “I want to fight not just for the family but millions of Vodacom subscribers who may have been taken for a ride in the promotion.”
He reportedly rejected an undisclosed payout by the mobile company “as a token for the SMS they now claim was a mistake”.
But Mr Njau argues that the lottery results were supposed to be computer-generated and he wants to know how it was that the message was sent to his son’s number erroneously. “After showing them the text message, they told me that it was true that it was from Vodacom, but was mistakenly sent by the system,” he recalls. “I was surprised by their response since they normally say that one winner of Sh100 million daily would be selected daily, and I was the one for the day.”
Mr Njau has stuck to his guns, rejecting an offer of “disturbance” pay as suggested by the betting board and Vodacom officials. He adds: “The trend has now turned into intimidation. The company officials have told me I will lose everything if I do not accept their offer. They have even claimed my son’s mobile number was not registered and, even more surprisingly, that it cannot be detected in their system.” Mr Njau has submitted his complaints in writing to the Gaming Board of Tanzania (GBT). In a letter dated 23 April, the GBT wrote that it encountered several issues in the case, among them his participation in the disputed lottery draw. The Board says that, according to Vodacom, he was not a legitimate subscriber and had never taken part in a lottery draw. And records show that there was no winner of Sh100 million on that day, according to the board reply.
Meanwhile, Vodacom admits to have communicated through SMS to the telephone number that is registered in the name of Innocent Njau. But, according to the Board, the company had clarified that the text message sent to Mr Innocent Njau was erroneously generated by the lottery system used in determining the winning numbers.
GBT Director General Tarimba Abbas said Daniel was not the rightful holder of the telephone number that received the text message and the person legally entitled to follow up f the matter is Innocent. Mr Abbas says in the letter, which Mr Njau describes as shocking, coming from an institution that is supposed to represent the interests of the public: “Even if you come to us with SMS that you won, we usually go back to the draw of that particular day and confirm it. We found that Innocent’s telephone number did not win Sh100 million.” Vodacom Tanzania’s Head of Brand and Communication, Mr Kelvin Twissa, defends the promotion.
 

Friday, June 26, 2015

U.S.A. SUPREME JUDGE CLARENCE THOMAS DISSENTS IN GAY MARRIAGE DECISION - WAY TO GO YOUR LORDSHIP !!!

Clarence Thomas invokes comparison to slavery in raging gay-marriage dissent.

Business Insider

View photo
.
clarence thomas judge supreme court
U.S.A.  Supreme  Court  Justice  Clarence  Thomas (Mark Wilson/Getty) 

Justice Clarence Thomas on Friday  26/6/2015 wrote a fiery dissent in response to the Supreme Court's 5-4 decision that gay couples have a constitutional right to marry.

In it, he took issue with the concepts of "liberty" and "dignity." He argued that the petitioners in this case were not deprived of their liberty, as they have been allowed to travel and settle freely without government intervention.

This is why, Thomas wrote, the majority led by Justice Anthony Kennedy focused its opinion on the petitioners' "dignity."

But Thomas wrote that there is no "dignity" clause in the US Constitution — and that, even if there was, the government could not bestow it upon a person or take it away.

To make his point, he invoked the examples of slavery and internment camps. From his dissent:

"The corollary of that principle is that human dignity cannot be taken away by the government. Slaves did not lose their dignity (any more than they lost their humanity) because the government allowed them to be enslaved. Those held in internment camps did not lose their dignity because the government confined them. And those denied governmental benefits certainly do not lose their dignity because the government denies them those benefits. The government cannot bestow dignity, and it cannot take it away."

Thomas went on to write that one's liberty and dignity should be shielded from the government — not provided by it.

"Today’s decision casts that truth aside. In its haste to reach a desired result, the majority misapplies a clause focused on 'due process' to afford substantive rights, disregards the most plausible understanding of the 'liberty' protected by that clause, and distorts the principles on which this Nation was founded. Its decision will have inestimable consequences for our Constitution and our society,"

 Thomas wrote in conclusion.

50 PEOPLE OWN A WHOLE DISTRICT IN TANZANIA !!!




http://www.thecitizen.co.tz/image/view/-/2764390/highRes/1045370/-/maxw/600/-/5506ln/-/03-Scandal.jpg

By Henry Mwangonde and Syriacus Buguzi

Posted  Thursday, June 25  2015 at  09:41
IN SUMMARY
The report by the Legal and Human Rights Centre (LHRC) says that more than 64.7 per cent of Tanzanians own land without formal documentation, with most of the land falling in the hands of people described as “grabbers”.
Dar es Salaam. A new report on land ownership in the country has detailed shocking details of land gabbing, with at least half of one district reportedly being owned by only 50 individuals.
The report by the Legal and Human Rights Centre (LHRC) says that more than 64.7 per cent of Tanzanians own land without formal documentation, with most of the land falling in the hands of people described as “grabbers”.
The land held by such people, according to the report, is often owned in the name of public interests, especially investment concessions. Speaking during the launch of the report yesterday in Dar es Salaam, LHRC Head of Corporate and Government Watch Flaviana Charles said that land grabbing was increasingly becoming widespread in the country.
“We looked at areas with big investments and noted a corresponding increase in cases of human rights violations,’’ said Ms Charles as she pinpointed Kilosa District in Morogoro Region where she revealed that about half of the land was in the hands of not more than 50 individuals.
Kilosa District covers an area of 14,918 square kilometres, is inhabited by 26,060 people, according to the 2002 national census.
“Rich people own the land and this has brought conflicts due to shortage of farming and grazing land for the common citizens,’’ said Ms Charles as she alluded to the report indicating that commercial pressure and poor land governance acquisitions were among the factors fuelling conflicts.
The report indicates that obtaining land titles deeds has remained a huge challenge for most Tanzanians whereby lack information on how land is acquired and insecurity in villages has almost become the norm.
The report, titled ‘Human Rights and Business’, is a compilation of data obtained in the regions that have been named by the LHRC as hotspot areas for human rights violation in the country. According to the report, at least 17 million Tanzanians still lack certificates for either customary or government rights of occupancy in about 15 regions which were earmarked for research by the LHRC.
Most of the country’s arable land, about 75 per cent, was found to have been occupied by either local residents, investment companies or other institutions including government agencies, the report further revealed.
It warned that the expansion of national parks was becoming rapid and creating land pressure, whereby at independence, the country was only occupied by the Serengeti National Park while now, the number of parks and other protected areas has expanded to more than 16.
In his remarks, the Director of Research and Record-keeping at the Commission for Human Rights and Good Governance, Mr Godlisten Nyange, said issues to do with how business affects human rights is of great concern to victims especially when they are not addressed.
He noted that land issues had implications to the right to personal integrity, the right to a healthy, sustainable way of life and standard of living. He then urged the relevant authorities and business entities to take the matter seriously. “It is high time businesses moved from philanthropic corporate social responsibility to accountable business practices which respect human rights,” he said.
In light of this report, Mr Nyange said that the report called for more to be done in the protection of human rights by various investors as a way of paying back from the profits made in the course of business.

THIS DECISION IS DEFYING ALLAH'S COMMAND ON HUMAN BEINGS !!!

  INNA  LILLAHI  WA-INNA  ILLAYHI  RAJ-UUN - ALL  OF  US  ARE ALLAH'S CREATIONS AND  ONE DAY

ABSOLUTELY AND FOR SURE, WE WILL FACE ALLAH'S RECKONING .

U.S.

Same-Sex Marriage Is a Right, Supreme Court Rules, 5-4

Photo
Supporters of same-sex marriage gathered outside the Supreme Court on Friday. Credit Doug Mills/The New York Times
WASHINGTON — In a long-sought victory for the gay rights movement, the Supreme Court ruled on Friday that the Constitution guarantees a nationwide right to same-sex marriage.
Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote the majority opinion in the 5 to 4 decision. He was joined by the court’s four more liberal justices.
The decision, the culmination of decades of litigation and activism, came against the backdrop of fast-moving changes in public opinion, with polls indicating that most Americans now approve of same-sex marriage.
As in earlier civil rights cases, the Supreme Court had moved cautiously and methodically, laying careful judicial groundwork for a transformative decision.
As late as October, the justices ducked the issue, refusing to hear appeals from rulings allowing same-sex marriage in five states. That decision delivered a tacit victory for gay rights, immediately expanding the number of states with same-sex marriage to 24, along with the District of Columbia, up from 19.
Largely as a consequence of the Supreme Court’s decision not to act, the number of states allowing same-sex marriage has since grown to 36, and more than 70 percent of Americans live in places where gay couples can marry.
The court did not agree to resolve the issue for the rest of the nation until January, in cases filed by gay and lesbian couples in Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio and Tennessee. The court heard extended arguments in April, and the justices seemed sharply divided over what the Constitution has to say about same-sex marriage.
Lawyers for the plaintiffs said their clients had a fundamental right to marry and to equal protection, adding that the bans they challenged demeaned their dignity, imposed countless practical difficulties and inflicted particular harm on their children.
The Obama administration, which had gradually come to embrace the cause of same-sex marriage, was unequivocal in urging the justices to rule for the plaintiffs.
“Gay and lesbian people are equal,” Solicitor General Donald B. Verrilli Jr. said. “They deserve equal protection of the laws, and they deserve it now.”
Same-Sex Marriage
The court decided in Obergefell v. Hodges and three related cases that the Constitution guarantees a right to same-sex marriage. Full analysis »
5-4
MAJORITY
Sotomayor
Kagan
Ginsburg
Breyer
Kennedy
Roberts DISSENTED
Scalia
Alito
Thomas
 
• Same-sex couples can marry in three dozen states, but federal appeals courts have been divided over whether states must allow same-sex couples to marry and recognize such marriages performed elsewhere.


Thursday, June 25, 2015

THE SOWETO DECLARATION FROM THE 5th AFRICA UNITY FOR RENAISSANCE CONFERENCE


From  Pambazuka  News, No. 732.

Soweto Declaration

From the 5th Africa Unity for Renaissance Conference

24/6/2015

http://pambazuka.org/en/category/features/95029



cc SOGV 
This Declaration contains some of the salient ideas from delegates who hailed from across the continent, as well as from the rest of the world, to articulate what is required for the creation of a united, liberated, renascent and prosperous Africa.
I. PREAMBLE

The 5th Africa Unity for Renaissance Conference was held in South Africa from 22 to 25 May 2015 in Soweto. The decision to hold the conference in Soweto, as well as to name this declaration after it, is symbolic of the ‘shift in the geography of reason’ that is required to bring about positive change given the realities of persistent inequitable spatial, economic and social relations in Africa. It is also befitting to remember Soweto’s sacrifice and rich history of resistance against apartheid. Delegates that hailed from across the continent, as well as from the rest of the world joined together with the South African participants in articulating what is required for the creation of a united, liberated, renascent and prosperous Africa.

Each African Unity for Renaissance Conference has sought to capture and bring together some of the insightful articulations and deliberations made over three days into declarations, which have previously been called the Tshwane Declarations, and to disseminate the declaration to reach key thought and policy leaders. The Third Tshwane Declaration was delivered to all the delegates present at the OAU/AU Jubilee celebration in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

The organising partners from South Africa have worked consistently and with full collaboration in order to run these series of African Unity for Renaissance Conferences (AUR) with the clear objective of generating Pan-African education for the creation of substantive change to re-shape with unity and renaissance the free African future. They have now been invited to continue this work by formally organising themselves, as permanent network members and long-term collaborators, representing a diverse vitality of perspectives, under the name of the Africa Unity for Renaissance Network (AURNET). This galvanisation of these series of conferences into the Africa Unity for Renaissance Network (AURNET) is necessitated by the sincerity and commitment required to not only articulate but also to create the attainable reality of a strong and united Africa, where Africans are enabled to make real the futures that they wish to see for themselves, through their own immense strength, wisdom, collaboration, shared vision, project and sustainable solidarity. A true united African agency is still waiting to be made free from all kinds of external influences.

The 5th Africa Unity for Renaissance Conference is also held at the time of the Diamond Jubilee of the Bandung Conference that created the non-alignment and third world route for stable and peaceful world order free from the domination of superpowers that created the Cold War. The world is still not secure, stable, predictable, peaceful, just, fair and sustainable. There is no end of history or clash of civilisations. What is missing is a real new history and civilisation to create a fully humanity anchored world. It is time to seize the moment in order to contribute by re-rooting humanity into the rich values of Africa to create a new history, culture and civilisation for peaceful co-existence for all in the world. The work that the AURNET will promote in the years to come with the African Unity for Renaissance Conference can provide the platform, space and road to produce through research the type of knowledge that will enhance a better understanding of how we can create a better future indeed for Africa and the rest of the world.

The 5th Africa Unity for Renaissance Conference in Soweto was symbolic of this, as it worked against the stigmatisation of the area as one that is supposedly ‘high risk’ and sought to send the message that knowledge of and for Africa must be generated by undertaking reverse learning from the grassroots level from the townships. It is important to recognise that in order for emancipatory engagements to be relevant and effective, they genuinely need to originate from the observations, articulations, and realities of ordinary people and their lived experiences by acknowledging the improvement of their livelihood as powerful sources of resilience, innovation and inclusivity.

‘Africa 2015 and Beyond: Engaging with Agenda 2063’ provided the overriding concern to undertake deep reflections for the 5th African Unity for Renaissance Conference. Delegates had the critical opportunity to reimagine alternatives, to reject and unlearn the artificial and disempowering divisions imposed by both subtle and overt forms of colonially designed fragmentations that Africa has not removed yet to express its free and united agency. The strength of the African identity to be made by all is one that recognises and celebrates unity through diversity and complexity. The 5th African Unity for Renaissance Conference thus sounded out a powerful call for the acknowledgment of the unique ability of Africans to create new humanity, new history and new civilisation to correct all the remaining colonial mistakes and internal spatial divisions by re-imagining and creating more equitable and emancipatory realities, from Soweto, to the rest of Africa, and, indeed, the world. It is Africa’s time to re-launch a vast Pan-African education from Soweto to every part of the Africana world.

II. SOME INSIGHTS THAT EMERGED FROM THE 5TH AUR

1. Massive epistemicides of African knowledge have perpetuated negative narratives about Africa, which must be overcome through the acknowledgement and promotion of the positive contributions of Africa as the origin of humanity, civilisation, philosophy, science, mathematics, astronomy, education, arts and culture, and religion.

2. Africa as the cradle of humanity, with its rich histories, philosophies and resistances, is uniquely positioned to create new, more inclusive and equitable humanities and realities. This knowledge must be reclaimed for the promotion of the dignity of all.

3. The African values of Ubuntu, Ma ’at, Ethiopianism and Afrikology as well as the movements of Pan-Africanism and African Renaissance, can play a critical role in anchoring African liberation, development and prosperity on the known African deep values, principles, humanity and civilisation to realise the full wellbeing of all the people without any exception. Africa has rich resources which all the ordinary people have the full right to access and utilise for the wellbeing of all.

4. There is an urgent need for the decolonisation and restructuring of entire educational systems, in order to realise the promises and potentials of African unity to change the present-day lack of African-centred knowledge systems.

5. African people have resisted all forms of destructions and oppressions, including colonialism, cultural genocides, enslavements and imperialisms and these resistances must contribute to all Africans to unite in practice. There should be unity in rejecting the destructive experience by also uniting in recognising and building on the positive contributions, knowledge, histories, philosophies and sciences that Africans have made to be the first to create humans to all other inventions.

6. While Africa has held a series of pan-African Congresses, has founded the OAU in 1963 and the AU in 2002, has had powerful and inspiring African liberation movements, and has won many battles against imperialist powers, full economic and political independence and freedom still remain a difficult challenge.

7. The need for African unity has been declared since 1963 formally by the meetings and protocols of the heads of state and the ministers; but there has not been any systematic implementation of at least even in a few areas, such as for example an African trade and investment area, to produce positive examples. Unity is a process and on-going. Substantive commitment requires that action be taken to implement unity. The people in Africa must be involved in making African unity. The people have to make the African unity history.

8. The AUR 5th Conference delegates said that 2063 for African Unity is too late. Africa must have united yesterday. If not yesterday, Africa must unite now. We need the African Agenda for realising African agency and unity for renaissance Now, Now and Now! If Africa does not unite now, how can we expect unity as late as 2063?

9. Embracing African agency means rejecting a passive attitude to matters that affect negatively Africa and its people. The whole educational system should be guided by Pan-Africanism. The re-education of all by appreciating the African contribution to knowledge and building on this to create new knowledge is part of the work to unite Africa now and not tomorrow.

10. While the AU, through its Agenda 2063, is attempting to envision a strong and prosperous Africa, African Unity cannot remain an ethereal and elusive promise for the future. This urgent struggle was begun many years ago and we have a duty to see this completed by changing the current functionalist perspective to unity with the substantive approach by recognising that colonialism did not come only for some Africans. It came for all opening for all Africans the opportunity to unite to remove it and other ills for good. Remain fragmented, African vulnerability continues; united Africa attains full freedom and independence for good.

11. Africa is vast and powerful, with a rich abundance of resources. In this context, if efforts were intensified for the effective economic, social, political, and cultural cooperation between African countries, Africa would be enabled to create the massive structural transformation by removing for good of inequalities, unemployment and poverty and building the wellbeing of both people and nature...

12. Africa has the ability to be a powerful innovator for emancipation and this agency can be realised through united efforts. Pan-Africanism remains an essential aspect for reimagining and creating the Africa that we all want to see built now and in 2063!

III. ACTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

1. The Africa Union must convince all the members to make the Month of May an African Liberation Education Month and recognise May 25 as Africa Liberation Day. African Liberation Day needs to be legislated as a day for all the people of Africa to join in re-education to build Pan-African unity and to promote full African agency.

2. Models for the establishment of centres for education, where future teachers are trained to impart positive knowledge of Pan-Africanism to all children living in different African countries, as well as the Diaspora, need to be developed and implemented.

3. Where incidents of xenophobia and Afrophobia occur, these acts demonstrate a failure of Pan-Africanism, both in terms of creating unity and a shared appreciation for one another’s humanity, as well as in terms of not having addressed continued poverty, inequality, lack of employment, being unemployable, desperation and lives lived without dignity. This should provide the clarion call to spread pan-African education across Africa, with this task of re-education being primary and urgent. All avenues for this task, including on-line platforms and others, should be explored, developed and implemented in order to address this problem.

4. Realising a prosperous, yet non-exploitative Africa, through effective policy and practice, requires the increased communication and collaboration between African academics, governments, businesses, and civil society. Work that encourages these connections must be strengthened in order to create vital and united social, political, and cultural African economies, in which all sectors of the population are included.

5. Civil service is service. Public servants must serve not try to be masters. Corruption must be eliminated. Within African leadership positions, public service and accountability to the people needs to be actively leveraged and engaged. In order to contribute positively to this work, and to hold leadership performance to account in terms of its service to the people, integrity, and honesty, the Africa Unity for Renaissance Network (AURNET) will create an African Public Service Index (APSI). Efforts to create public service training, actively promoting the values and benefits of Pan-Africanist alliances and highlighting the importance of creating independence from external sources of funding, will also be undertaken.

6. Inter-African integration is still very limited with African trade and investment suffering from collaborative distance. There is an urgent need to redress this gap by promoting the comprehensive strengthening of inter-African economic, educational, social, cultural and labour related trade, exchange and investment. Further collaborations in the development of technology and infrastructure are also urgently needed.

7. Africa is in a position to pioneer social entrepreneurship for prosperity and equality and to redefine development by building on the rich values and traditions that Africans have created. Africa does not need to catch up with anyone, but must rather create wellbeing by and through the deep-rooting of African knowledge which can serve as an example to the rest of the world.

8. Both African leaders and the people must learn to walk the talk; they must attract the funding for African development not through loans, debt, or donor hand-outs, but rather, through contributions from their own resources. The reality of collaborative contributions for mutual development, as well as the rejection of external donorship and funding must become a reality now, not in 2063.


9. Africa must fully invest in the capabilities and talents of her children in the Diaspora. African leaders and institutions must enhance Africa’s capacity to find African funds for building brain-gain and should establish African retuning talent infrastructure and funding.

10. African unity is both necessary and sufficient to bring full political and economic independence .The AU/NEPAD must be encouraged to be active in the African Unity for Renaissance conferences to share together how all stakeholders can join contribute to transform Africa structurally and not just with issuing protocols that often remain unimplemented.

11. There is a need to re-imagine Africa as an innovator and time to use Pan-Africanism to embed a total knowledge, invention, innovation, learning and competence building culture (KLIC). No pan-African unity means, no African agency; if there is no unity and agency, there will be no African renaissance for Africans to own their economy today and even in 2063! Science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) should become like food and water for all the youth to be exposed and educated. All ministries of science and technology in Africa should begin to implement a strong African Research Area.

12. The Africa Unity for Renaissance that started in South African can be used as an educational platform to create and inspire new pan-African thought leaders through the establishment of research programmes, academies, and partnership networks that include civil society, alumni, governments, industries, and universities. Such activities are integral to the creation of the Africa we wish to see. Engagement with agenda 2063 must continue to make African unity an everyday process not a prolonged projection after another 50 years.

[NOTE: The Soweto Declaration was compiled by Prof. Mammo Muchie based on the submission of the recommendations from the participants of the Africa Unity for Renaissance 5th Conference. This Soweto declaration will be sent to the Africa Union Meeting in June to be held in South Africa. It will also be published and shared to reach as many Africans as possible.]