Published on Tuesday, 28 April 2015 07:00
Written by ROSE ATHUMAN
Director of Presidential Communications, Mr Salva Rweyemamu
THE
government has defended the recently passed Cybercrime Act 2015, saying
that it will help in the security of the nation in issues pertaining to
cyber crimes, including terrorism and not meant to infringe on the
freedom of the public.
Addressing
journalists in Dar es Salaam, the Director of Presidential
Communications, Mr Salva Rweyemamu, said the nation is faced with
significant challenges related to cybercrime and the new law soon to be
signed by President Jakaya Kikwete will help address the challenges.
“There
have been a lot of negative reports about the Cybercrime Act 2015, many
expressing their feelings that it will infringe on the public’s
freedom.
This
is not the case. The ever growing and changing technology has brought
with it a lot of cyber threats that will be addressed through this Act,”
Mr Rweyemamu noted.
He
noted that the Act will also address issues of cyber terrorism
including potential damages and illegal interference of systems and
computer related frauds.
“There
is no country that does not have this law to protect and address cyber
crime challenges. We must all understand that the security of the nation
is first and foremost ... we must ensure the nation is protected from
this new threat, paused by technology,” he explained.
The
Cybercrime Act 2015 has touched on a number of cybercrimes which
include Illegal Access, Illegal interception, Illegal data interference,
Data espionage, Illegal system interference, Illegal device,
Computer-related forgery, Computer-related fraud, Child pornography and
Pornography and Identity related crimes, among others.
The
cybercrime fear in the country has been increasing day by day with
cries from all corners of people losing millions of shillings through
bank accounts and mobile phones.
Government
and private sector networks and person accounts have been hacked into
and confidential and personal information accessed by cyber-criminals,
which according to Mr Rweyemamu, will be addressed by the Cybercrime Act
of 2015.
On
the same note, the director of presidential communications said that
recently President Kikwete was invited by King Abdulla II of Jordan to
attend a one day consultation meeting on terrorism challenges facing the
Horn of Africa.
Mr
Rweyemamu clarified that the president did not publicise the meeting
because King Abdulla II wanted it that way, due to the critical position
of Jordan’s location.
He
said Jordan is bordered by Saudi Arabia to the South and East, Iraq to
the North-East, Syria to the North and Israel and Palestine to the West.
President
Kikwete joined three other leaders that at the meeting who included
President Uhuru Kenyatta of Kenya, President Ismail Omar Guelleh of
Djibouti and President Sheikh Mohamoud of Somalia.
The
meeting was held with the aim of finding a holistic approach in an
effort to counter terrorism, through member states strengthening efforts
in fighting terrorism by maintaining coordination and consultation
among various parties in the fight against terrorism.
Meanwhile,
the media has been urged to accept the Access to Information and Media
Service Act, which is here to protect journalists and will not infringe
on media freedom.
Mr
Rweyemamu said that the fact that why it was under certificate of
urgency is not a new thing since it has been done before on other bills.
He
said the Access to Information and Media Services Bill is long overdue,
noting that the process to have the law started a long time ago.
Comment from the Author:
Personally, I suffered from cyber crime in 2009 when more than $400 was stolen from my CampusEdge checking Account - 3048 through my ATM Card 2065 while on airline flight from Washington DC, USA to Amsterdam, The Netherlands on 12/6/2009. As this law comes into effect, I am waiting to see if I could prosecute the said cybercrime at home because all my efforts at reclaiming my remaining $900 from my ATM CARD of the BANK OF AMERICA have met with deaf ears. I have yet to be reimbursed my money. I am very disappointed that the BANK OF AMERICA does not realise that some of us in other countries are not able to contact them through the numbers they provide in their letters/email messages.
As time does not run against the state in criminal matters, I am still hopeful that the new law could be my salvation after all.???
No comments:
Post a Comment